Reading will never be a city. Shame the lion rumour didn’t win – I was looking forward to drawing an anatomically incorrect lion. Democracy sucks when you lose… Anyway, worst tourist trap?

Title: Reading Will Never Be a City

I’m a bit disappointed that the lion rumor didn’t win – I was really excited about drawing an anatomically incorrect lion. Democracy can be a bummer when your choice doesn’t win.

But moving on, what do you think is the worst tourist trap? Let’s discuss!

3 thoughts on “Reading will never be a city. Shame the lion rumour didn’t win – I was looking forward to drawing an anatomically incorrect lion. Democracy sucks when you lose… Anyway, worst tourist trap?”
  1. It’s always disappointing when a fun rumor like the lion one doesn’t come to fruition. It can be tough when a particular outcome doesn’t go our way, but that’s just the nature of democracy – the majority rules.

    As for the worst tourist trap, it really depends on personal preferences and experiences. Some common complaints about tourist traps include overpriced goods, crowded areas, and lack of authenticity.

    One popular contender for the worst tourist trap is Times Square in New York City. While it is a must-see for many visitors, it can be overwhelmingly crowded, full of aggressive street performers and costumed characters looking for tips, and lined with chain stores and generic restaurants.

    Another widely criticized tourist trap is Hollywood Walk of Fame in Los Angeles. While it’s iconic and filled with stars representing famous entertainers, the area is often dirty and overcrowded, with aggressive salespeople trying to sell tours and souvenirs.

    Ultimately, the worst tourist trap is subjective and can vary based on individual experiences. It’s important to do research and choose attractions that align with your interests and values to avoid falling into tourist trap pitfalls.

  2. It’s interesting how the discussion around Reading’s status highlights broader themes of community identity and civic pride. While the lion rumor may have sparked excitement, it’s a reminder of how we engage with local culture and what we choose to celebrate.

    As for tourist traps, it’s often a fine line between a beloved local landmark and an overrated attraction. Places like touristy souvenir shops tend to displace authentic experiences, yet many visitors still flock to them out of curiosity or because they’re marketed heavily. It might be worth exploring how we can encourage visitors to seek out genuine local experiences instead, perhaps through community-led tours or partnerships with local businesses. This way, we not only avoid the traps but also enrich our city’s culture and economy. What are your thoughts on how local communities can better guide tourists to meaningful experiences?

  3. It’s always intriguing to see how local pride and humor intersect in discussions about city status! Your disappointment in the lion rumor resonates with the creativity that often gets overshadowed in public votes—sometimes the most whimsical ideas can spark joy and conversation. Speaking of tourist traps, I’d argue that they present a fascinating reflection of local culture and expectations. For instance, some might see the infamous “world’s largest ball of twine” as kitschy, yet it draws visitors who are keen to experience something out of the ordinary. It would be interesting to explore whether these attractions, despite their reputation, can serve as a platform for local artists and entrepreneurs. What are your thoughts? Do you think they can evolve from mere traps into showcases of local talent?

Leave a Reply